Sunday, 22 February 2015

An LTE over Wi-Fi spectrum grab is coming

Pundits say spectrum demand will overrun supply by 2018 or 2019. Grabbing someone else’s frequencies would be one solution.

Unlicensed spectrum would be the logical place to expand traffic if, as mobile networks are finding, their licensed spectrum is running out.

Why not shift over to unlicensed spectrum? It's unlicensed, after all, so anyone can use it. Who would object?

Well, the answer to that question may be a bunch of Wi-Fi users, like you and me, if it doesn't work as promised and stomps on existing use, such as Wi-Fi.

Wi-Fi at 5 GHz

The new piggy-backing technology uses the same Wi-Fi band that mobile device users are beginning to take advantage of in the home and workplace. That is 5 GHz—the free-to-use band you'll find in newer routers and mobile devices, like tablets and recent phones.

Five GHz Wi-Fi is underused, fast, and well-suited to media delivery in small spaces, like the home. That's why new mobile devices use it.

And it appears Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) have taken a fancy to it too. But in that case it's likely for paid-for use in phones.

License Assisted Access
The new technology works by combining existing mobile network spectrum with low-power Wi-Fi spectrum to create a bigger pipe. The technology uses micro-cell-like mini antennas.

It's interchangeably called LTE-U, which stands for LTE-Unlicensed, or its new name LAA, or License Assisted Access.

Remarkably, that new name sounds more like an altruistic, social government program. The new moniker even manages to change elements of the name from "unlicensed" to "licensed." There's a reason marketing experts get paid what they do.

Interference
And there's a reason LAA needs to tread lightly. Wi-Fi Alliance, the Wi-Fi trade body, says LAA poses a risk that could negatively impact "billions of Wi-Fi users who rely on 5 GHz," and that "more work needs to be done."

Ericsson has just said its LAA roll out will begin in Q4 2015.

Algorithms
Wi-Fi band rules say users can't cause interference. It's not allowed. The MNOs and equipment makers insist that LAA won't cause interference.

And maybe that indeed will be the case. Radio signals are better aimed these days, and interference minimization does in fact tie in with an industry trend where frequency waste is increasingly minimized through algorithms and other beaming techniques. Ericsson and Qualcomm are innovative leaders in RF technology.

Interference has historically been created by frequencies stepping on each other—a kind of overlapping caused by a lack of targeting. Clean it all up and there's more capacity through less interference.

Deployment

Ericsson says it can obtain speeds of 450 Mbits using both the LTE spectrum that the carrier has paid for at great expense, usually at a government auction, and this unlicensed band it's plucked for free.

Initial users will be Verizon and T-Mobile, among others, says Sarah Thomas in LightReading, a telecom publication.

"Rude" technology
The big question, of course, is the interference issue. If Qualcomm and Ericsson, the two main players, can get LAA to work flawlessly on the increasingly popular public frequencies they're purloining, as they say they can (and have shown in the lab), then kudos to them. They've improved society.

If, on the other hand, LAA "takes over the band it operates in" and causes Wi-Fi devices to "experience degraded service, service interruptions, and/or complete loss of their connections," as an article by Tinaya in the blog WorldTVPC described as a worst-case scenario, then there'll be trouble. Not least from me. I live on a hilltop, and microwave 5 GHz can travel a long way via line-of-sight with no obstructions.

To add insult to injury, we may all be paying for that stomping in our wireless bill too.

Best Microsoft MCTS Certification, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com

Tuesday, 17 February 2015

10 alternative carriers that can save you serious cash on your smartphone bill

When it comes time to choose a wireless carrier, most Americans just go with AT&T, Sprint, or Verizon. Recently, more and more people have been tempted by T-Mobile’s cost-slashing “Uncarrier” moves, but that's about where it ends: the four major carriers.

And that reluctance to look beyond the big guys could be costing you money.

Did you know there are a host of different carriers in the U.S. that use the same networks as the big companies but offer some serious discounts on your monthly bill? They’re called mobile virtual network operators (MVNOs) and piggyback on the major carrier's networks.

If you’ve never heard of MVNOs, you soon will. Google reportedly wants to get in on the MVNO game and offer its own cell plans using the networks of Sprint and T-Mobile, paired with Wi-Fi. Beyond MVNOs, another report says Cablevision is planning a mobile carrier service called Freewheel that will depend entirely on Wi-Fi—including free access to the company’s more than one million public hotspots.

But you don’t have to wait for Cablevision and Google to get in the cell phone service game. There are already numerous MVNOs running on networks from all four major carriers, and some that also offer Wi-Fi only plans. Many of the more interesting carriers run on Sprint, but there are also a number of options that use T-Mobile for anyone looking to use a GSM-based phone.

In no particular order, here's a look at 10 MVNOs that are well worth a look, at least on paper. We haven't been able to test these networks ourselves so you'll have to judge their quality on your own.

It should also go without saying, but if you plan to bring your own device (BYOD) to an MVNO—not all allow it—the device must be compatible with that MVNO’s underlying network, be it Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon, or AT&T.

1. Ting
Carrier: Sprint
BYOD: Yes (some restrictions)
Cost: $21 per month (monthly average)
LTE: Yes

Ting is one of the more interesting choices among MVNOs. The company offers what is more or less a pay-as-you-go model. Ting categorizes usage by buckets. The first 1-100 minutes, for example, cost $3, the next bucket $9, and the next $18. There are also buckets for SMS and MB of data usage, and you must pay a monthly per-device fee of $6 each. The company’s complete rates are on its site. Ting says the average monthly cost per device is $21.

A variety of phones are available with Ting, including the iPhone 5s, Nexus 5, and Galaxy S5. If you're thinking of moving to Ting, the company says it will pay 25 percent of the early termination fee (ETF) from your current carrier, up to $75.

2. Republic Wireless

Carrier: Sprint
BYOD: No
Cost: $5-$40 per month
LTE: Yes

Republic Wireless is one of several carriers that integrates Wi-Fi, reverting to a cellular connection only when Wi-Fi isn’t available. In fact, if you live in an urban environment and are daring enough, you can pay just $5 per month for a Wi-Fi-only plan. The bad news is that if you aren't connected to Wi-Fi your phone won't work. Nevertheless, this might be an ideal plan for a university student who lives on campus.

After the Wi-Fi plan, how much you pay really depends on what you need. For $40 per month you can get unlimited talk, text, and data on 4G and Wi-Fi, though the data is throttled after 5GB/mo. There's also a $10 plan that's talk and text on cell and Wi-Fi, plus Wi-Fi only data. Whichever plan you choose, Republic phones default to Wi-Fi whenever possible.

3. FreedomPop

Carrier: Sprint
BYOD: Yes
Cost: Free to $80 per year
LTE: Yes

Another Wi-Fi centric carrier similar to Republic, FreedomPop offers a $5 Wi-Fi-only plan. You can also get unlimited voice, text, and 500MB of data for $11 per month, or you can pay $80 up-front for an entire year of the same plan. There's also a $20 monthly plan that offers unlimited everything over Sprint's 4G network, but data is downgraded to 3G speeds after the first gigabyte.

4. Scratch Wireless

Carrier: Sprint
BYOD: No
Cost: $2 to $4 per day, $25 to $40 per month
LTE: Yes

Scratch Wireless takes another interesting pay-as-you-go approach like Ting. Instead of buckets, Scratch uses a “passes” concept. You can get a daily pass for $2 offering unlimited voice, and pay another $2 for unlimited data for a day. If you need a monthly pass, Scratch offers $25 for unlimited data and another $15 gets you a month of unlimited voice. Scratch does not charge for SMS, which is free under all its plans.

5. MetroPCS
Carrier: T-Mobile
BYOD: Yes
Cost: $40-$60 per month
LTE: Yes

An actual part of T-Mobile, MetroPCS offers standard prepaid packages similar to the mainstream carriers. You can still save some money, however, as MetroPCS offers unlimited talk and text along with 2GB of LTE and unlimited data at “average MetroPCS network speeds” beyond that for $40 per month. Plans with 4GB of LTE and unlimited LTE cost $50 and $60 per month, respectively.

6. Brightspot

Carrier: T-Mobile
BYOD: Yes
Cost: $30-$55 per month
LTE: Yes

Target's MVNO Brightspot offers a number of basic plans. If you're not a big talker, you can get a $35 plan that includes unlimited text, up to 3GB of data at 4G speeds, and 300 minutes of voice.

7. UltraMobile

Carrier: T-Mobile
BYOD: Yes
Cost: $19-$59 per month
LTE: Yes

Ultra Mobile offers a number of standard plans that can meet your needs. The company also offers some international options for those who need to call overseas (as do a number of other MVNOs, including Brightspot). For $29 Ultra Mobile offers unlimited talk and text, and 1GB of LTE data.
5phones4
Michael Homnick

8. Net10

Carrier: AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon
BYOD: Yes
Cost: $25-$80 per month
LTE: Yes

Owned by TracFone, Net10 offers connections on all four networks depending on your preferences. For $40 per month you can get unlimited talk, text, and data. The downside is Net10 only offers the first 500MB of data at LTE speeds.

9. PTel

Carrier: T-Mobile
BYOD: Yes
Cost: $20-$65 per month
LTE: Yes

A T-Mobile-based MVNO, PTel is a little bit cheaper than Net10 with $35 per month for unlimited talk, text, and data. Like Net10, PTel only offers the first 500MB at LTE speeds.

10. RingPlus

Carrier: Sprint
BYOD: Yes
Cost: $2-$33 per month
LTE: Yes

If you can get past the cutesy names of its monthly plans (such as Kate, Hazel, and Bella,) RingPlus has a wide range of offerings. The most realistic plan for serious smartphone users is Data, priced at $30 per month. This plan gets you 300 voice minutes, unlimited text, 2GB of data, and unlimited Wi-Fi calling. RingPlus charges 6 cents extra per message for MMS.
Switch and save?

Switching to an MVNO is not for everybody, especially if you live somewhere with limited cellular connectivity options. But if you’re in an area where networks like Sprint and T-Mobile offer good service you could save yourself some serious cash.


MCTS Training, MCITP Trainnig
Best Microsoft MCTS Certification, Microsoft MCITP Training at certkingdom.com

Tuesday, 3 February 2015

VMware CEO touts ‘One cloud, any app, any device’ plan

VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger talks up new hybrid cloud strategy, SDN, OpenStack, partnering with Google and competing with Amazon and Microsoft

VMware is shifting its cloud computing engine into high gear this week with a series of product updates, including new versions of its vSphere virtualization software and VSAN storage platform, plus a distribution of OpenStack and integrations of its NSX software-defined networking tool with its vCloudAir public cloud. This follows a partnership announcement last week with Google in the cloud. VMware CEO Pat Gelsinger - former COO of EMC and CTO of Intel - sat down with IDG Enterprise Chief Content Officer John Gallant and Network World Senior Editor Brandon Butler to discuss all the activity, what it means for customers and how VMware will compete with Amazon and Microsoft in the cloud.


John Gallant (JG): Pat, VMware has had a lot of news between last week and today. What is the single most important thing you want customers to understand about your announcements?
Pat Gelsinger (PG): If there's one phrase that we're asking people to get from this it’s: One cloud, any app, any device. This is a view that there is a foundation for one cloud, and vSphere and what we're announcing in networking and storage gives us this unique position for a unified cloud architecture that can be on and off premise. As we bring that to market, it's in response to what we hear customers saying. It's an increasingly liquid world, it's tumultuous. We see restructuring of traditional players and established players are being moved aside. And we definitely see this unique opportunity for VMware. People are increasingly relying on software at the application layer and they increasingly need a software-defined infrastructure to enable the level of speed, agility and flexibility to respond to that. That's where we see this set of announcements, the products that we're bringing being really a very foundational launch for us as we start 2015.

Brandon Butler (BB): At your VMworld keynote address you spoke a lot about VMware’s software defined data center vision. Where do you see these announcements fitting in with that strategy? And also, where is VMware along that journey to achieving the software-defined data center? It seems like VMware has a strong presence in the private cloud and virtualization markets. But things like public cloud and NSX are still relatively nascent.

PG:When we think about software-defined data center (SDDC), we think of the management of compute, network and storage as common ingredients that we apply both on premise and off premise, and that's truly what the hybrid cloud is - it’s the ability to tie those two together. In vSphere we have 650 new features, including key breakthroughs for the size for mission-critical workflows like big Hana databases and Hadoop workflows that are supported. We'll have new performance benchmarks that come out, high availability improvements and resiliency features that allow us to attack mission critical workloads. So the simple message is: Any workload can and should be virtualized. And VSAN is a foundational component of the SDDC, too. VSAN has major improvements in data formats, performance, size, data features and snapshots. VMware Integrated OpenStack is a set of technologies that can be consumed through our traditional APIs as well as through increasingly open APIs. And finally, and to me maybe most importantly, is the hyper-networking. When you talk about moving a VM from my on-premises data center to a public cloud resource, typically moving the compute piece is tricky. Standards will be fairly well established, but moving the network, that's hard - all of the [Layer 2 and 3] network features required. That's why the hybrid networking aspect of this announcement is really I'll say the magic that allows this true on- and off-premise ability of the hybrid cloud to function. So taken together, this is the SDDC with a complete set of ingredients, major advancements on all fronts, and now the ability to consume them in new and powerful ways.

BB: You recently announced a partnership that will make aspects of Google’s cloud platform available to customers in VMware’s vCloudAir public cloud portal (Read more about that Google-VMware deal here). How do you envision customers using this new functionality and why was this an important partnership for both VMware and Google?

PG: At the highest level, we think of this as a win-win. It will combine the presence VMware has with the enterprise customer and the unique offering that we have to deliver hybrid services with the scale Google has with regard to analytics services, storage services and the database, which it hasn’t in any meaningful way been able to bring to the enterprise customer. So what they have so complements what we have and bringing those together through the vCloudAir service we think brings our customers the services that can allow them to significantly extend the workloads and opportunities they have for using cloud services.

JG: Who do you see as your primary competitor in the hybrid cloud? It would seem to us that it's Microsoft, because they're trying to create a similar enterprise hybrid cloud play.
PG: Whenever I talk about cloud, I always say the four companies that matter are VMware, Amazon, Google and Microsoft. The two that have a legitimate position to deliver a hybrid value proposition are Microsoft and VMware. We have such a foundational leadership position on premises, our 80+ percent share of the on-premise virtualized environment gives us the foundational position of great leadership versus Microsoft or anybody else. And the networking component is really unrivaled. That fundamental leadership, huge on premise, 50 million virtual machines plus networking, we think gives us a highly differentiated position versus Microsoft or anyone else.

BB: How will this partnership with Google impact the competitive dynamics in the IaaS cloud market with Microsoft and Amazon?
PG: It’s going to enhance the unique differentiation we provide. This combines the best of public cloud - these incremental services that Google brings - with the best of private cloud with unique hybrid capabilities. If you now compare that foursome, now you have VMware and Google partnering to further enhance those unique differentiations that we bring. Compared to Microsoft or Amazon, or really anybody else, this really emphasizes the unique aspects we’re able to bring as a hybrid service offering to the enterprise customer.

PG:The pricing and our business strategy are tied together here. Because the first is we're going to leverage the SDDC technologies. We're going to use those quite effectively to have a very cost-effective infrastructure, and that's what the SDDC is all about. And our announcements that we have today with vSphere and the improvements in performance and capacity, virtual SAN and its capabilities and networking really allow us to use industry-standard infrastructure to very effectively deliver enterprise-class services. Further, when we think about the cost dynamics for service providers, they have the lowest cost of capital and huge international networks built out, and increasingly the network is the cost driver of clouds. If you look at the bundled delivery cost to an enterprise customer, those networking costs are critical. And again, we're leveraging the largest investments in that area on the planet. Further, we do think that as we go forward here, this is a big boy's game, and as such, smaller players will dissipate on the edges. That's how we see things playing out and we are ready, willing and are making the investments necessary to take our business, plus our partners' business, forward effectively. If you listed all the partner announcements that we've done, that's a very formidable force.

BB: When will the features you’re talking about be available to customers and where are you on rolling out the platform to enable the hybrid cloud? Is there still a lot of innovation going on or is this the platform that we're going to see moving forward for the foreseeable future?

PG: We have all the components in the market, period. We have networking, we have storage, we have compute, we have management; they're all there. What we're doing now is tying those together with the on-demand capacities of our vCloud Air. So I'll say all the foundational bricks are in place and now we're building on those components. I use ESX as a reference: Essentially the hypervisor was introduced in 2002 and in 2010 we crossed 50% install; in 2012 we hit 70%. It's those kinds of numbers that we're going to see, but it took about a decade for those things to play out. That said, for virtual networking, this is maybe year 2005 of ESX? Storage, we're in year 2004 of ESX.

There's an enormous amount of innovation that still sits in front of us as we go execute on the hybrid cloud. And I think some of these other technology areas around the SDDC and the hybrid cloud will have somewhat shorter adoptions because we're able to build on that hypervisor footprint that we have with vSphere. So, I think that we will be able to go faster, but we're still talking about years of innovation in front of us as we build out these new capabilities. For a technology-oriented company like VMware, we are just thrilled. The stuff that we do at the infrastructure level and the innovations that we do in terms of networking and automation and telemetry, and the ability to operate with new policy-driven mechanisms against these workloads, this is stuff that gets us excited. I mean, I've got thousands of engineers that get out of bed every morning, if they even went to bed, specifically for these kinds of assignments.

BB: I see that OpenStack is an important part of this announcement. Why has that been an important technology for VMware to embrace and adopt?

PG: Our embrace of OpenStack in the VMware Integrated OpenStack (VIO) offering really is recognizing the bubbling cauldron of activity in the industry around OpenStack. And what we looked at is that most of that value is at the higher levels of the stack. People are asking: How can I consume, interact and program API-driven provisioning of infrastructure? As we looked at those technologies, it became a straightforward answer for us to add those OpenStack components to our best-of-breed technologies, like ESX, NSX and VSAN.

BB: What would you say to a customer who might wonder if VMware is the best company to work with OpenStack on? Would it be better to work with a company like Red Hat, given its Linux background, or one that has a deeper background in open source?

PG: I will point out to that customer that probably almost all of the Red Hat footprint is already running on VMware. Somewhere between 30 to 40 pecent of all the VMs that we run are RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) or some other Linux variant already. So even though the OS layer might be using RHEL, the virtual machine layer is almost always based on VMware and the relevant KVM from Red Hat is a really trivial market share comparison. It's just not robust to that infrastructure level.

Further, even if you're just diehard and everything has to be open source, you say -- Boy, there just aren’t any of those components available at the management layer that fully support some of those networking functions. There is nothing like NSX available and all of those environments at the component level are still being embraced into those environments as the only significant available production worthy version. So every one of these rock-hard scalable world-class components is available in those open source/Openstack environments, and it's really bringing the best of those two worlds together. We don't view this as an "either/or" world, we view it as an "and" world, because it really is combining the best of those technologies to accomplish the most resilient scalable mature infrastructure for enterprises to operate, but also to innovate.

JG: Pat, I wanted to follow up on an original question from Brandon. I think the software-defined data center strategy has had some really important announcements that have moved that strategy along. But how are you measuring customer adoption of this? What are the benchmarks you have and can you tell us a little bit about what you're seeing from customers on the uptake of the overall vision?

PG: Some of the public data that we talk about is on the earnings call, but I'll expand from that just a little bit. Some of the things that we look at would be management adoption inside of the large footprint of vSphere customers, and what we've said on our earnings call so far is that we have 14% adoption. We're also carefully monitoring how many of our customers are taking three or four of the legs of the software-defined data center. So 14% now take management and we're now saying -- how many of our customers take vSphere management and networking? vSphere management networking and storage? And that's one of the metrics that we're monitoring very closely.

So how many of those customers have we taken into full production using all legs of the software-defined data center. And obviously something like that starts as a trickle, turns into a stream, and finally it's a full-blown river of adoption. We're seeing all of the right trends with regard to NSX adoption, the storage adoption and the adoption of those in conjunction with each other. And that to us is when we have the full-meal deal.

Note: In the earnings call last week, VMware reported it has 400 paying NSX customers, up 60% quarter-over-quarter. NSX bookings doubled in the second half of 2014 compared to the first half and the product has over a $200 million annual booking run rate. VMware reported it had 1,000 paying customers using the VSAN storage platform.

BB: You've talked about NSX as a real differentiator for VMware. Do you get the sense that customers are ready to adopt that technology? And also, what would you say is the focus for NSX now? At VMworld it seemed like you were talking about NSX a lot more from a security standpoint compared to the software-defined networking standpoint that it had been defined as before. How do you define NSX with customers now and do you think they're ready to adopt this cutting-edge technology?

PG: If there's any doubt on that question, look at our earnings call and the adoption numbers we're seeing, the momentum we're seeing with customer pick-up, the revenue acceleration we're seeing. So unquestionably, we're crossing that point on the curve in adoption. The two primary use cases are application agility and micro-segmentation or security. Nominally they're 50-50'ish for customers to date. And one is the fast road and one is the complete road. The fast road is micro-segmentation: You walk into the customer and you say - do you have any assets that are less protected than you'd like them to be? And if the CIO doesn't say yes to that question, you know he's not going to be there a long time anyway, right?

Everybody has their most critical assets that are the best protected, and with NSX you start to lay out how you can quickly bring micro-segmentation as an additional layer of protection into those environments. You don't change the network architecture, you don't even necessarily need to invite the network admin to the meeting. It's a software overlay technology, you have the CISO and the vAdmin all on board very quickly. And after they've begun isolating some of their highest valued assets and getting some operational experience with it, then you would like the network admin because now we're ready to have a conversation about how we fully deploy the value of network virtualization.

The other question is really one about transforming the network operations so that applications can be deployed with all of their incumbent firewall provisioning, routing, and rules in a fully automated way. That takes application deployment times from weeks to hours or minutes. Those are the transformational use cases that we've seen at places like eBay. And those are the two drivers. Both of those are going extremely well with customers. The reason we've ended up talking a lot more about micro-segmentation and security is it's just so easy for customers to adopt it and deploy it in a very targeted and highly beneficial way.

JG: I wanted to follow up on NSX: In order to make this hybrid VMware vCloud Air service work, does that mean you're working in conjunction with carrier partners and that they're deploying NSX as well?

PG: There are multiple pieces to that. Does the customer have to deploy NSX on premise? Does the carrier have to deploy NSX? And is the cloud service deploying NSX? What we announced is that vCloud Air has now implemented NSX and is making those services available to customers. That was the key piece of the announcement.

From a service provider, from the network provider perspective, they don't need to do anything, because it really is about getting my pipe connected up to vCloud Air across whatever network service I have. However, we're increasingly finding those service providers enhancing their service offerings via NSX. They're offering those as differentiated VPN services or MPLS connectivity for their enterprise customers. So they don't have to, but increasingly they're seeing that they can differentiate their service offerings to enterprise customers by adopting and deploying NSX as part of their network offering.

On the customer side, they don't need to do anything other than access those services through standard protocols like OSPF and BGP and others. Now, if they have deployed NSX internally, there's more elegant things that they can do with it, but it begins by a simple onramp, the standard protocols that they're already deploying and using today.

JG: So a customer doesn't have to commit to NSX, they can just take advantage of its benefits?

PG: Correct. Just access those services through standard network protocols and services that they've most likely already deployed and are highly mature on. Over time, we'll do more if they have put NSX in place, but that's round two of the discussion. Round one is -- can I now start to view the vCloud Air service as a segment, a compatible extension of my data center, that's entirely network compatible without modifying any of my security, firewall, rules, anything else? And that's now this absolutely unique capability that we're offering in the marketplace.

BB: I want to ask about EMC's federation strategy. There's been a lot of talk in the market about whether EMC might break up its federation of EMC storage, VMware, RSA, Pivotal and now VCE. Activist investors Elliott Management Group have been pushing for that. Where do you stand on that? Would you like VMware to spin out from EMC? And as a follow-up to that, there’s been some discussion about EMC Chairman Joe Tucci’s potential retirement. Would you ever want to replace Joe Tucci as chairman of the EMC federation?

PG: We're very pleased that the truce was announced with Elliott and EMC, the agreement is in place and we're happy with that. And the reason we're happy is, as I've gone on record and said a number of times, we think that the federation model is the best model in this period of high tumult change, etc. in this phase of the industry.

We think being bigger and more strategic as a federation is an asset for the companies, for EMC as well as VMware as well as Pivotal, and we believe at this phase of our journey that it's absolutely the best way to go and we expect that to continue for years to come. We do, in many, many circumstances, find that customers simply say -- I want you guys to work together, partner together, deliver me more value together into my environment, and I want to view the federation as one company. And we are getting that strong response from customers and some of our biggest Q4 wins were a direct result of the federation partnership.

So we're very comfortable and happy that this came together as it did and pleased that at least that's been taken off the table for at least 2015. With regard to me personally, those decisions are made by the board, of course, and I'm thrilled and excited by what I'm doing at VMware and hope to do it for many years to come.

JG: Are there any other aspects of the announcement, or anything else that you would like to touch on or want readers to know about?

PG: We talked about the vSphere 6, which is a huge announcement. We didn't spend a lot of time talking about virtual SAN and virtual volumes, the storage technologies, but we view those as very, very substantive technology improvements. I think you guys got it with respect to VIO, and we covered that pretty effectively. And then I'll say there is this profound differentiation of the hybrid network, and taken together, SDDC is the foundation for one cloud, any app, any device. The components are in place, customer uptake is strong and we've got years of innovation in front of us that's turning me and my engineers' cranks every day.



Best Microsoft MCTS Certification, Microsoft MCP Training at certkingdom.com